一篇关于员工激励制度的英文文献3000字左右

要采纳我的哦

1. 原则之一：激励要因人而异
由于不同员工的需求不同，所以，相同的激励政策起到的激励效果也会不尽相同。即便是同一位员工，在不同的时间或环境下，也会有不同的需求。由于激励取决于内因，是员工的主观感受，所以，激励要因人而异。

在制定和实施激励政策时，首先要调查清楚每个员工真正需要的是什么。将这些需要整理、归类，然后来制定相应的激励政策帮助员工满足这些需求。
2. 原则之二：奖励适度
奖励和惩罚不适度都会影响激励效果，同时增加激励成本。奖励过重会使员工产生骄傲和满足的情绪，失去进一步提高自己的欲望；奖励过轻会起不到激励效果，或者使员工产生不被重视的感觉。惩罚过重会让员工感到不公，或者失去对公司的认同，甚至产生怠工或破坏的情绪；惩罚过轻会让员工轻视错误的严重性，从而可能还会犯同样的错误。
3. 原则之三：公平性
公平性是员工管理中一个很重要的原则，员工感到的任何不公的待遇都会影响他的工作效率和工作情绪，并且影响激励效果。取得同等成绩的员工，一定要获得同等层次的奖励；同理，犯同等错误的员工，也应受到同等层次的处罚。如果做不到这一点，管理者宁可不奖励或者不处罚。

管理者在处理员工问题时，一定要有一种公平的心态，不应有任何的偏见和喜好。虽然某些员工可能让你喜欢，有些你不太喜欢，但在工作中，一定要一视同仁，不能有任何不公的言语和行为。
1. 激励员工从结果均等转移到机会均等，并努力创造公平竞争环境。

举例来说，吴士宏在IBM从一个打扫卫生的人做起，一步一步到销售业务员，到地区负责人，到中国区总经理，是什么原因呢？除了个人努力，还应该说IBM 良好的企业文化给了一个发展的舞台，那就是每一个人都有无限的发展机会，只要有能力就会有发展的空间，实现自我，这在很多企业是做不到的，这种体制无疑会给员工莫大的激励作用。
2. 激励要把握最佳时机。
——需在目标任务下达前激励的，要提前激励。
——员工遇到困难，有强烈要求愿望时，给予关怀，及时激励。
3. 激励要公平准确、奖罚分明
——健全、完善绩效考核制度，做到考核尺度相宜、公平合理。
——克服有亲有疏的人情风。
——在提薪、晋级、评奖、评优等涉及员工切身利益热点问题上务求做到公平。

4. 推行职工持股计划。
使员工以劳动者和投资者的双重身份，更加具有关心和改善企业经营成果的积极性。

现代人力资源管理的实践经验和研究表明，现代的员工都有参与管理的要求和愿望，创造和提供一切机会让员工参与管理是调动他们积极性的有效方法。毫无疑问，很少有人参与商讨和自己有关的行为而不受激励的。因此，让职工恰当地参与管理，既能激励职工，又能为企业的成功获得有价值的知识。通过参与，形成职工对企业的归属感、认同感，可以进一步满足自尊和自我实现的需要。建立和提高员工参与管理、提出合理化建议的制度和职工持股制度，加强员工各层次与领导层的交流沟通，提高员工主人翁参与意识。
5. 荣誉激励
对员工劳动态度和贡献予以荣誉奖励，如会议表彰、发给荣誉证书、光荣榜、在公司内外媒体上的宣传报导、家访慰问、流览观光、疗养、外出培训进修、推荐获取社会荣誉、评选星级标兵等。

6. 关心激励
对员工工作和生活的关心，如建立员工生日情况表，总经理签发员工生日贺卡，关心员工的困难和慰问或赠送小礼物。
7. 竞争激励
提倡企业内部员工之间、部门之间的有序平等竞争以及优胜劣汰。

8. 物质激励
增加员工的工资、生活福利、保险，发放奖金、奖励住房、生活用品、工资晋级。

9. 信息激励
要经常交流企业、员工之间的信息，进行思想沟通，如信息发布会、发布栏、企业报、汇报制度、恳谈会、经理接待日制度。

1. One of the principles: incentives to vary from person to person
Because of the different needs of different staff, therefore, the same incentive effects of policy incentives will play a different. Even with a staff, at different times or circumstances, will have different needs. Because of incentives depending on the internal and the subjective feelings of the staff are, therefore, incentive to vary from person to person.

In the formulation and implementation of incentive policies, we must first investigate each employee clearly what is really required. Required to organize, classify, and then to formulate appropriate policies to help motivate employees to meet these needs.
2. Two principles: appropriate incentives
Appropriate incentives and penalties will not affect the incentive effect, while increasing the cost of incentives. Award overweight employees would have to meet the mood of pride and lost the desire to further enhance their own; reward incentives too light will not achieve the effect, or so employees do not have a sense of attention. Heavy penalties are unfair to make employees, or loss of the company's identity, or even slow down or damage arising from the emotions; leniency error will underestimate the seriousness of the staff, which will probably make the same mistake.
3. The principle of three: fairness
The fairness of the management staff are a very important principle, employees are any unfair treatment will affect his mood and work efficiency, and effectiveness of the impact of incentives. Employees to obtain the same score, we must receive the same level of incentives; the same token, employees committed the same error, but also should be subject to the same level of punishment. If you can not do this, managers would prefer not to reward or punishment.

Managers deal with employees at issue, must have a fair mind, should not have any prejudices and preferences. Although some staff may allow you to enjoy, some you do not enjoy, but at work, must be treated equally and should not have any of the words and acts of injustice.
1. Stimulate the transfer of staff from the results of equal to equal opportunities and strive to create a level playing field.

For example, Wu Shihong at IBM from a clean start with the people, step by step to the sales clerk to the district person in charge, General Manager of China, what are the reasons for this? In addition to individual efforts, but also said that IBM should be a good corporate culture to a stage of development, that is, everyone has unlimited opportunities for development, as long as there is capacity there will be space for the development of self-implementation, which is to do a lot of companies are not, this system will undoubtedly inspire a great role of the staff.
2. Inspire the best time to grasp.
- Takes aim at pre-order incentive the mission to advance incentives.
- Have Difficulties employees, desire to have strong demand, to give the care and timely encouragement.
3. Want a fair and accurate incentive, reward
- Sound, perfect performance appraisal system to ensure appropriate assessment scale, fair and reasonable.
- Have to overcome there is thinning of the human pro-wind.
- In reference salary, promotions, awards, etc.评优involve the vital interests of employees on hot issues in order to be fair.

4. The implementation of Employee Stock Ownership Plan.
Workers and employees in order to double the capacity of investors, more concerned about the outcome of business operations and improve the initiative.

Modern human resources management experience and research shows that employees are involved in modern management requirements and aspirations, and create and provide opportunities for all employees is to mobilize them to participate in the management of an effective way to enthusiasm. There is no doubt that very few people participated in the discussions of the act and its own without incentives. Therefore, to allow trade unions to participate in the management of properly, can motivate workers, but also the success of the enterprise to obtain valuable knowledge. Through participation, the formation of trade unions on the enterprise a sense of belonging, identity, self-esteem and can further meet the needs of self-realization. Set up and improve employee participation in management, the rationalization of the proposed system and the Employee Stock Ownership and strengthening leadership at all levels and the exchange of communication and enhance the awareness of staff to participate in ownership.
5. Honor incentive
Staff attitude and contribution of labor to honor rewards, such as recognition of the meeting, issued certificate, honor roll, in the company's internal and external publicity on the media reports, home visits condolences, visit sightseeing, convalescence, training out of training, access to recommend honor society, selected stars model, such as class.

6. Concerned about the incentives
The staff concerned about work and life, such as the staff set up the birthday table, birthday cards, general manager of the issue of staff, care staff or difficult and presented a small gift sympathy.
7. Competitive
The promotion of enterprise among employees, departments compete on an equal footing between the orderly and the survival of the fittest.

8. The material incentives
Increase their wages, welfare, insurance, bonuses, incentive houses, daily necessities, wages promotion.

9. Information incentives
Enterprises to communicate often, information among employees, the idea of communication, information such as conferences, field release, enterprises reported that the reporting system, the association manager to receive the system date.

这可是纯英文的：

Employee incentives in public, private sectors are poles apart
By J. Patrick Coolican
Tue, May 26, 2009 (2 a.m.)

The career track is often the same at America’s elite law and auditing firms, investment banking houses, technology start-ups and biotechnology companies. Young, talented newcomers are paid princely sums, but it’s understood that only the most innovative and hardworking will last more than a few years.
They trade job security for six-figure salaries. They know that three years at McKinsey & Company or Goldman Sachs can lead to a fine career elsewhere.
The result: A workforce that is highly competitive and constantly refreshed.
Compare that with the human resource model for college-educated government workers, including teachers: Relatively low starting pay, a compressed salary structure with fairly tame merit incentives, job security — workers are rarely fired — and a guaranteed pension.
So what type of person does each compensation structure attract? And should government be more entrepreneurial in its pay and benefits?
Fair questions, said Gary Burtless, a labor economist for the nonpartisan Brookings Institution, a think tank in Washington, D.C.
“What’s the private sector do?” Burtless said. “They offer good salaries when they’re young, but give them no job security. They make a tough choice at five to seven years and often dismiss half, two-thirds or, at the best law firms, as many as nine-tenths.
“They keep only the most productive.”
By comparison, state and federal governments do nearly the opposite. “The salary isn’t great for beginners. Top pay isn’t great, but we do offer these two saving graces: First, it’s hard to get fired. And two, if you stick it out for 30 or 35 years, you have a more-secure pension.
“Why do we do it this way?”
Matthew Murray, a University of Tennessee labor economist, had an answer: “The incentive structure is intended to create loyalty and continuity.”
Turnover is the enemy. “You keep trained, skilled people on the job and don’t need to go out do a costly search, and you might find a worse employee,” he said.
Murray acknowledged the implications. “What you get with government employees, by virtue of these steady jobs, you get risk-averse people. They may be good solid employees, but they may not be very innovative. Safe jobs attract people who want a safe environment.”
In times of crisis, however, perhaps boldness should outweigh safe and steady, says Katherine Barrett, a consultant on government management and co-author of Governing Magazine’s “Grading the States 2008.”
“The idea of looking at all the assumptions that have gone into public sector compensation systems seems like a good one,” Barrett said. “Because I don’t know that the rich benefit structure is well thought out as a way to attract young people.”
Does a talented young college graduate — alight with ambition and living in the fierce urgency of now — really care about a cushy pension he can collect if he works in government for 30 years?
Is an alternate compensation structure possible for government?
The idea of paying teachers or social workers high starting salaries seems wishful thinking. But what if long-term pension liabilities could be sharply reduced by forcing those young workers, many or most of whom won’t make the cut after a few years, into a defined contribution plan, say a 401(k) with an employer match? The savings could go to higher salaries.
One key difference between the private and public arenas, however, is labor unions. They protect workers from getting fired, even though it might be precisely what is needed. And union leaders are often mid- or end-of-career veterans, for whom pensions are a top concern.
Democrats are in a position in Nevada and Washington to reform the compensation structure for government workers. Unions are big Democratic supporters.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/may/26/employee-incentives-public-private-sectors-are-pol/

奖励和惩罚不适度都会影响激励效果，同时增加激励成本。奖励过重会使员工产生骄傲和满足的情绪，失去进一步提高自己的欲望；奖励过轻会起不到激励效果，或者使员工产生不被重视的感觉。惩罚过重会让员工感到不公，或者失去对公司的认同，甚至产生怠工或破坏的情绪；惩罚过轻会让员工轻视错误的严重性，从而可能还会犯同样的错误。

在制定和实施激励政策时，首先要调查清楚每个员工真正需要的是什么。将这些需要整理、归类，然后来制定相应的激励政策帮助员工满足这些需求