热点话题hot-spot
当今媒体current media
中国青年报China youth daily
联合国教科文组织United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
《2005全民教育全球监测报告》”2005 Education for all Global Monitoring Report - The Quality Imperative”
素质qualities
Income Evaluation System收入评价体系
Well-educated,well-paid?
It is well known that the topic of“Well-educated,well-paid?” is one of the hot-spot in current media. “China youth daily” reported on December 1, 2005 that in the ”2005 Education for all Global Monitoring Report - The Quality Imperative” provided by UNESCO, a clear view was put forward: well-educated, well-paid.
Many people support the view mentioned above. They think that the people with high degree should be paid more than those with low degree for the formers have to spend more time & attempt, and give more sacrifice. Additionally, it’s the case for current China. For example, college teachers have been become one of the high income groups, while those with the most economic difficulty are often low-educated groups.
I think the nature of the topic of “the relationships between educational level and income” is just how we can evaluate the deserved income of a person properly. The income of a person relates not only to his degree, but also to his qualities, his abilities as well as his dedicative spirit, therefore the evaluation of the income of a person should be integrated with his degree, qualities, abilities, and dedicative spirit. Our nation and the society should gradually establish a set of perfect “Income Evaluation System”, then we can fulfill “distribution according to one's performance” truly.
Know to all, "be subjected to level of education more high, is the income more high?"This topic is one of a little bit hot topics of medium nowadays.According to 《Chinese youth report 》December,2005 is 1, United Nations teaches a section text the organization to provide of 《2005 civil education global monitor report 》medium put forward a standpoint definitely:The educational background is more high, the income is more high.
Many people support is above-mentioned this standpoint.They think the educational background tall person's lower than the educational background person wants to pay a more time and does hard a greater sacrifice, so should have higher income.And, see from the realistic circumstance of our country is also so.For example, the university teacher has become one of the high income communities, but the economy is the most difficult of usually all is be subjected to the lower community of the level of education.
I think that the substance of the topic " the relationship with income of the level of education", how right evaluate one personal deserved income problem.One personal income of high and low not only have relation with educational background, but also should have relation with character, ability and dedication spirit etc., should be the comprehensive evaluation which includes educational background, character, ability and offers spirit...etc. to a personal evaluation with high and low income.Nation and society should start to build up a set of more perfect"income evaluation system" gradually, real attain to press 劳 allotment.
Well-educated,well-paid? As is well known, "the higher the level of education, higher income? "This topic is currently a hot topic among the media. According to the "China Youth Daily" reported on December 1, 2005, UNESCO provided by the "2005 Education for All Global Monitoring Report," a clear perspective : the higher qualifications and higher earnings. Many people support the view above. They believe that educated people than less educated people have to spend more time and effort to make greater sacrifices, there should be a higher income. Moreover, from our point of view the reality is this. For example, university teachers has become one of the high-income groups, and economic difficulties are usually the most affected by the less educated groups. I believe that the "relationship between educational attainment and income," the real topic is how to correctly evaluate a person deserve income. Not only a person with low income qualifications, should also with the quality, ability and dedication, and other relevant to a person's income level evaluation should include qualifications, quality, ability and dedication of the comprehensive evaluation. State and society should gradually establish a more perfect "income evaluation system" truly distribution according to work.
Know to all," suffer the level of deucation more high, income more high?" this topic is one of a little bit hot topics of the now medium.According to December of 2005 of Chinese youth in report 1 newspaper a for, United Nations teaching section text how to organize providing 2005 all the people education worlds monitors the report inside is clear and definite to put forward a standpoint:The educational background is more high, the income is more high.
Above this standpoint in support in many people.They think, the lower than educational background person in tall person in educational background wants to pay more time with work hard, to do the greater sacrifice, so should have the higher income.And, see from the realistic circumstance of the our country also is like this.For example, university the teacher has become the one of the high income communities, but the economy usually is the most difficult is all to suffer the lower community in level of deucation.
I think, the substance of the topic " level of deucation and the relation of the income", how right evaluate a the income problem that individual deserve.A personal income of high and low not only have relation with educational background, should but also follows character, ability and offer spirit etc. relevant, to a high and low evaluation in personal income should be to include the educational background, character, ability and offer the spirit waits of synthesize the evaluation.The nation should establishes to rise gradually with the society a set of much more perfect" income evaluation system", real attain to press labor force allotment.
According to 《Chinese youth report 》December,2005 is 1, United Nations teaches a section text the organization to provide of 《2005 civil education global monitor report 》medium definitely put forward thus a standpoint:The educational background is more high, the income is more high.Many people all agree this standpoint, because they think, being subjected to level of education a tall person to compare to be subjected to level of education a low person and pay a more effort, pay a more time, also want to do a more sacrifice.Seeing from the realistic circumstance of our country, this standpoint can also get a full certificate.Say for example, the university teacher has already become one of the social high income crowds;City country contrarily and regardless, the economy is the most difficult of usually say come all is accept the lower community of the level of education.
But I think, although the high educational background heel high income should has certain contact, absolutely can't rows mark of equality!Because the educational background of a person is also high to be unequal to an ability strong, the high mark mentally retarded person also hasn't a few?Income's shoulding get up with ability contact is right.
Anyway, "the educational background is more high, the income is more high" has become a kind of reality.Its aggressive meaning is obvious:Will stir up the enthusiasm which educates since more family investment sons and daughters necessarily, make the whole character of our all citizen get an exaltation thus.But, it the negative effect same can't neglect-if we fall through education equity, certanly will space out the income margin of of different crowd so, then to society of stable the creation negative influence.
是不是用翻译机翻译的啊??比如说是Say for example???