机器人能否替代人类?

您好，且不谈理由，楼上发的你都看不懂您怎么背？建议您背中文，然后通过谷歌翻译渠道了解英文 这是我的观点（正方是吧？就是说机器人可以代替人类）

1. 机器人的生命和健康耐久度比人类高。

2. 机器人不会感性处理问题。

3. 机器人遵守任何规则，不会犯罪，便于管理

4. 人类目前依赖于电脑，等于依赖机器人

5. 几百年前人类靠肉搏打仗，随后出现了枪，现代打仗通过高科技渠道获胜，未来会通过机器人渠道获胜

6. 青出于蓝而胜于蓝

7. 机器人工作效率比人类好

8. 机器人不需要休息，娱乐，放假等

9. 培养机器人成本低于人类

10. 机器人是高科技的结晶

    但是我认为，正方不好辩论，（毕竟正反方都是人类...）有人说机器人不会繁殖，难道机器人不会自己通过机器制造？

    纯手打,有不完善之处还请指教,求采纳!

答:不行，因为机器人需要电池，而人不需要电池，每当电池没有了机器人就会死亡。

我的答案是不能。因为机器人机器人是死脑筋，还有一个就是我们人创造了机器人，但是机器人不能创造我们人。机器人你指定他今天给谁穿衣服，他就只给谁穿衣服，但人不一样啊人，如果叫你给他穿衣服，然后别人要叫你帮他穿衣服，你当然会去呀，但是机器人也只会给指定的那个人穿衣服而不会改变。

The Robot is a Machine after AllAs isvividly shown in the pictures, a manand a robot were playing
The Robot is a Machine after All
As is vividly shown in the pictures, aman and a robot were playing cards.Obviously, the man was losing, for hewas with a sad face. The robot, onthe other hand, was smiling. Thenthe man went to open the body ofthe robot and changed somethinginside it. A moment later, they wereback again to the game. Now it wasthe robot’s turn to frown: nearly allthe coins were won over by the man.
Simple as the cartoons are, theirsymbolic meaning is profound andfar-reaching: the robot is but arobot, a product by man. It can neverreally defeat human beings; muchless can they control or replace man.With this in mind, we need no longerworry about the miserable fate ofhuman beings as foretold by somepessimists or as described in someAmerican films like “The StarWar” or “Matrix”.
While we should be optimistic aboutthe future of human beings, we needalso be warrant of the dangerresulting from some inappr