请高手帮忙翻译成英文，谢谢！

This photo named " eye covetously".
A vulture is staring at an african child who suffers from hunger and illness, waiting her time to leave the world. Once the child died, the body will be a meal for vulture.
this photo won the highest prize in American Journalism--- the pulitzer prizes , but the author was blamed by the public: the reportor why not try to save the little kid, with a piece of bread or even a glass of water? why not to stop the vulture and grab the little life from death? Is it to say that a vivid life is not even weathy than a news picture or a prize? the report explaned that death comes everywhere at that time in africa and one can do nothing for the refugees. when he was going to leave disaster area with grey mind, when the chopper's engine had started, he saw this image and press the shutter just as aboarding. he took the photo and had to leave right away. the public voice did not stop because of his explain and the author end his life for this photo.
the vulture is waiting for a feast and the little child will be sacrificed for another life,it is natural rules and who can say it's wrong?
Because we are human, the humanity of that reporter, as well as all the kindess people, make us to see the cruel scene. when all the public accused that reporter, he has to choose to end his life due to Social pressure of public opinion.

think about the photo and the innocent author, what is the difference between the little child and the author? the child became a meal for vulture and the author, became a joke for those "kindness" ones.

This picture named "look at fiercely as a tiger does".
A child in Africa from disease and hunger makes a goner, next to immediately have a vulture look at fiercely as a tiger does staring at the child, vultures waiting patiently at the end of life. Because the child's life was over, the body will immediately become a vulture of a good meal.
The picture won the highest award in American Journalism Award for Pulitzer, but Kevin Carter has been accused of: the reporter why not leave the camera to the starving children in a pot of water, a piece of bread? Why not save the children under to death sickle and Buzzard beak and claws? One of the children the value of life is not the enemy of a piece of news photos or a News Awards? The reporter explained to public opinion, then Africa the starvation, death, the face of the victims died who would be at a loss what to do; when he left the local area with a heavy heart, when the mission of the aircraft has been launched, when he was about to board the plane, he saw a poignant human sight, immediately back to take down, and then I had to leave. But public opinion not because of his explanation and stopped, finally the reporter with his life and thank the world: his Dutch act.
The vultures waiting for a meal, the children will be contributing to the life of another. The law of nature, who can tell me what's wrong with them?
Because we are human, human nature to the reporter and all the good people to see this scene cruelty. When people have denounced the reporter, the reporter conscience so that he can not afford the social pressure to choose to give up life to show the world.
Think of this picture, then think of the accused and the reporter, what is the difference between the child and the reporter's fate?
The children finally do vultures feast, the reporter why not do what "good" people's spiritual feast?
在线自己翻译的，望采纳