谁能翻译?看不懂。给我英文也可以

大神。。。
2024-12-27 20:04:33
推荐回答(2个)
回答1:

There was a positive approach to this, with clear lines and clearly pointed entries at the outset. You generally maintain control as the texture thickened, although there was a slight loss of evenness at times. However, you showed much tonal awareness with some effective soft passages and a build in intensity through to the end.
The opening was well judged, both with regard to tone and tempo, but there were than some fluctuations in the pulse. You created some vivid contrasts with smooth lyrical lines although accompanying parts were sometimes rather prominent and the pedalling not always so clean. However, you maintained the continuity and conveyed some sense of the overall structure.
This was played in a spirited manner, with some lovely light touches and effective contrasts. However, a slightly slower tempo may have allowed for even more clarity and control in the fingerwork, as well as more time and space in which to insert a greater sense of rhythmic precision and grip.

There was a prompt initial response to these and they were played at a good pace, but there was not always complete security in 3rds and 6ths. The expeggive were quite even on the whole.
You conveyed the general outline of this, but did not observe all of the rests fully. There was much attention to the detail of estisulation and expression though.
I step in the repetition of teh lower post. Cadencand all 3 chords incorrect, but did spot both modulations. Not entirely sure in the final test, where the period was incorrect.
There was much to encourage, with commendable technical facility and some musical awareness, with just a little more polish at times your overall mark could have been even higher.

回答2:

没有人能看懂吧……